Prediction of Bradley Mousley vs Nathaniel Lammons Head-to-Head, At

Wojtek Kolan

Our Predictions

H2H Records Career Stats

HEAD TO HEAD
B. Mousley vs N. Lammons

Bradley Mousley

AUS

1

Win

Played

0

Win

Age

6'2" (188 cm)

Height

5'11" (180 cm)

Ret.

C. Rank

595

259

Best Rank

591

Total Titles

YTD Titles

$28.3K

Career Money

Right-Handed

Plays

Right-Handed

Nathaniel Lammons

USA

1

Win

Played

0

Win

Age

6'2" (188 cm)

Height

5'11" (180 cm)

Ret.

C. Rank

595

259

Best Rank

591

Total Titles

YTD Titles

$28.3K

Career Money

Right-Handed

Plays

Right-Handed

Head-to-head: Mousley 1 - 0 Lammons

They have played 3 sets in total, with Bradley Mousley winning 2 and Nathaniel Lammons winning 1. The last match between Bradley Mousley and Nathaniel Lammons was at the Launceston Challenger, 06-02-2018, Round: R1, Surface: Hard, with Bradley Mousley getting the victory 6-7(7) 7-5 6-2.

Players	Head To Head Match Wins
Mousley	1
Lammons	0

Last 1 H2H Matches:

(R1) Launceston Challenger(02-06-18)

Stats

Bradley Mousley

Nathaniel Lammons

B. Mousley vs N. Lammons H2H Profile

B. Mousley	Stats	N. Lammons
$28,340	Career Prize Money	$0
56.70% (182-139)	Career Total W/L	53.42% (78-68)
1	Hard	0
2	Titles	0
1	Total H2H Matches	0
0% (0-0)	YTD Win/Loss	0% (0-0)

B. Mousley vs N. Lammons Match Preview:

Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Bradley Mousley has won 0% of points on their second serve, while Nathaniel Lammons has won 65.38%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Bradley Mousley, in recent form, has won 0% of their opponent's second serve points, while Nathaniel Lammons has won 45.45%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 26.67% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
Under pressure analysis: Bradley Mousley has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Nathaniel Lammons has saved 50.00% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
Performance overview: Over the last year Bradley Mousley has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/0), with Nathaniel Lammons winning 0% (W/L 0/1) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
Best surface: Bradley Mousley has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 61% (W/L 33/21), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 17% (W/L 1/5). Nathaniel Lammons has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 61% (W/L 50/33), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 0% (W/L 0/1).
Player level: In the last year, Bradley Mousley has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0), where as Nathaniel Lammons has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 0.00% of matches (W/L 0/1). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Bradley Mousley winning 1 times and Nathaniel Lammons being victorious 0 times. They have played 3 sets in total, with Bradley Mousley winning 2 and Nathaniel Lammons winning 1.
The last match between Bradley Mousley and Nathaniel Lammons was at the Launceston Challenger, 06-02-2018, Round: R1, Surface: Hard, with Bradley Mousley getting the victory 6-7(7) 7-5 6-2.
Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:50:55.
Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Bradley Mousley has played against opponents with an average rank of 0 while Nathaniel Lammons has played against players with an average rank of 867.
Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Bradley Mousley has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Nathaniel Lammons has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
Break point conversion: In recent form, Bradley Mousley has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Nathaniel Lammons has converted 50.00% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.

Bradley Mousley vs Nathaniel Lammons Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.

B. Mousley vs N. Lammons H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions

B. Mousley	Stats	N. Lammons
1	H2H Matches Won	0
2	Sets Won	1
19	Games Won	14
13	Aces (Total)	10
6	Total Double Faults	4
1:50:55	Average Match Time	1:50:55
64% (57/89)	1st Serve %	66% (70/106)
91% (52/57)	1st Serve Win %	73% (51/70)
56% (18/32)	2nd Serve Win %	44% (16/36)
33% (3/9)	Break Pts Won %	0% (0/0)
37% (39/106)	Return Points Win %	21% (19/89)
100% (1/1)	Best‑of‑3 Win %	0% (0/1)
100% (1/1)	Deciding Set Win %	0% (0/1)
0% (0/0)	1st Set Won, Won Match	0% (0/1)
0% (0/0)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	100% (1/1)
100% (1/1)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	0% (0/0)

Recent Performance Stats

B. Mousley Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
Adelaide International - Adelaide - 13-01-2020
Q1 Stephane RobertS. Robert	L	6-4 6-0	Stats
Kobe Challenger - 04-11-2019
R1 Jumpei YamasakiJ. Yamasaki	L	6-2 4-3 ret.	Stats
Playford Challenger - 28-10-2019
R1 Gage BrymerG. Brymer	L	6-2 6-1	Stats
Traralgon Challenger - 21-10-2019
R2 Tatsuma ItoT. Ito	L	6-4 6-3	Stats
R1 Matthew Christopher RomiosM. Christopher	W	6-2 7-6(4)	Stats

View All

N. Lammons Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
Guangzhou Challenger - 08-09-2025
Q1 Tomohiro MasabayashiT. Masabayashi	L	5-7 7-5 1-2 ret.	Stats
Charlottesville Challenger - 01-11-2021
Q1 Gijs BrouwerG. Brouwer	L	6-0 6-2	Stats
Mouilleron-Le-Captif Challenger - 04-10-2021
Q1 Mats RosenkranzM. Rosenkranz	L	6-4 4-6 7-6(4)	Stats
Szczecin Challenger - 13-09-2021
Q1 Nicola KuhnN. Kuhn	L	6-3 6-4	Stats
Nottingham 1 Challenger - 07-06-2021
Q1 Borna GojoB. Gojo	L	7-6(2) 6-7(9) 6-4	Stats

View All

B. Mousley vs N. Lammons Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents

B. Mousley	Stats	N. Lammons
56.70% (182/139)	YTD Win/Loss	53.42% (78/68)
55.78% (410/325)	Sets Win/Loss	55.46% (188/151)
52.22% (3710/3395)	Games Win/Loss	52.85% (1681/1500)
57.14% (132/99)	Hard Win/Loss	60.24% (50/33)
61.11% (33/21)	Clay Win/Loss	45.45% (10/12)
22.22% (2/7)	Indoor Hard W/L	45.00% (18/22)
55.56% (15/12)	Grass Win/Loss	0.00% (0/1)
0.49	Aces Per Game	0.3
1705	Aces Total	463
0.2	Double Faults Per Game	0.15
695	Total Double Faults	233
1:2:3	Average Match Time	1st Match
584.44	Average Opponent Rank	397.35
63% (9860/15718)	1st Serve %	60% (3350/5549)
74% (7299/9860)	1st Serve Win %	70% (2359/3350)
51% (2994/5858)	2nd Serve Win %	48% (1061/2199)
39% (477/1231)	Break Points Won % (Total)	40% (162/401)
35% (5476/15547)	Return Points Win %	35% (1907/5473)
42.86% (3/4)	Slam W/L	0% (0/0)
12.50% (1/7)	Main Tour W/L	0% (0/0)
40.86% (38/55)	Challenger W/L	33.33% (13/26)
65.73% (140/73)	Futures W/L	60.75% (65/42)
57% (179/312)	Best of 3 Sets Win %	54% (78/145)
67% (2/3)	Best of 5 Sets Win %	0% (0/1)
53% (71/134)	Tiebreaks Win % (Total)	52% (24/46)
52% (50/96)	Deciding Set Win %	35% (16/46)
88% (177/155)	1st Set Won, Won Match	82% (83/68)
12% (177/22)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	18% (83/15)
19% (144/27)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	17% (63/11)